USPTO serial 79143726
HER STORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBRAY, KATHERINE M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HER STORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
HER STORY TASARIM LIMITED SIRKETI
TR
ANK KIYMETLI MADENLER ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ANK KIYMETLI MADENLER ANONIM SIRKETI
KARAKAS TEKNOLOJI ÜRÜNLERI ALTIN; ISLEMEITHALAT IHRACAT; SANAYI VE TICARET ANON IM SIRKETI
TR
ANK KARAKAS TURIZM INSAAT MÜCEVHERAT ANONIM SIRKETI
TR
Other trademarks owned by ANK KARAKAS TURIZM INSAAT MÜCEVHERAT ANONIM SIRKETI
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, marketing and publicity services; organization of exhibitions and trade fairs for commercial or advertising purposes; office functions; advisory services for business management; business accounts management; import-export agencies; business efficiency experts; auction and reverse auction services; the bringing together, for the benefit of others, of a variety of goods, namely, precious metals and their alloys and goods in precious metals or coated therewith, jewellery, precious stones, horological and chronometric instruments (excluding the transport thereof), enabling customers to conveniently view and purchase those goods from wholesale outlets, retail outlets and from a general merchandise catalogue by mail order or by means of telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HER STORY TASARIM LIMITED SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by ANK KIYMETLI MADENLER ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by KARAKAS TEKNOLOJI ÜRÜNLERI ALTIN; ISLEMEITHALAT IHRACAT; SANAYI VE TICARET ANON IM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks owned by ANK KARAKAS TURIZM INSAAT MÜCEVHERAT ANONIM SIRKETI
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named HER STORY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2023 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 24, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 20, 2019 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2019 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 22, 2019 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 25, 2018 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 29, 2015 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 4, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 24, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 22, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |