Drawing for THE FRED HOLLOWS FOUNDATION

USPTO serial 79143887

THE FRED HOLLOWS FOUNDATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4805854Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 2015
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE FRED HOLLOWS FOUNDATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan L. Heller

Candice E Kim Greenberg Traurig LLP1840 Century Park East#1900Los Angeles, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical apparatus and instruments for optometry, ophthalmology, eye care surgery and for treatment of diseases of the eye and for the diagnoses of eye conditions and diseases; medical imaging apparatus for optometry, ophthalmology and eye care; intraocular lenses; artificial eyesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
036Charitable fund raising services; charitable financial services, namely, providing financial funding, support and sponsorships to charitable organisations and medical providers operating in the field of eye care and the prevention of blindnessSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
041Education and training services, namely, providing classes, seminars in the field of eye care and prevention of blindness and providing printed training materials in connection therewith; providing on-line non-downloadable training publications in the nature of reviews, journals, blogs, and magazines in the field of eye care and prevention of blindness; arranging and conducting educational conferences, seminars and courses in relation to eye care and prevention of blindness; publishing services, namely, publishing of reviews, journals, opinion editorials and training books; on-line electronic publishing of books and periodicals; publishing of web magazinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
044Surgical and medical services in the fields of optometry, ophthalmology and eye care; surgical and medical services, namely, providing medical treatment for the prevention of blindnessSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 16, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jan 16, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 1, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Mar 11, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 23, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 23, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Dec 8, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 8, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 4, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 19, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 23, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 23, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 20, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 3, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jun 3, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 3, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 20, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 15, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
May 15, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 22, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 22, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 20, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Apr 20, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Apr 20, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Apr 20, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 30, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Oct 30, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 30, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 10, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 2, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 2, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 17, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 3, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 3, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 2, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Mar 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Mar 13, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance