USPTO serial 79143942
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD W. GOODMAN, CHRISTOPHER L. KUYPER, EDWARD BLOCKER, MICHAEL E. MARION, DAVID SCHREIBER
EDWARD W. GOODMAN, CHRISTOPHER L. KUYPER, EDWARD B PHILIPS IP&S465 COLUMBUS AVENUE, SUITE 340VALHALLA, NY 10595UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software plug-ins for medical purposes in particular for use in the review and analysis of ultrasound images in the ultrasound diagnostic imaging field | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, in particular ultrasound apparatus and instruments for diagnostic purposes; and Medical apparatus and instruments, in particular ultrasound apparatus and instruments, namely, e.g., ultrasound systems for cardiac-related diagnosis and imaging | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 28, 2021 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 12, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 12, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2017 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 15, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 15, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2017 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 20, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 7, 2015 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 18, 2015 | ISMR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 14, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 12, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 23, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 8, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 8, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 7, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |