Drawing for XOR

USPTO serial 79144160

XOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLSON, KRISTIN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Apparatus for locomotion by air or water; caravans; mopeds; cycles; frames, kickstands, brakes, handlebars, wheel rims, pedals, tires, wheels or saddles for cycles or bicycles; strollers; handling cartsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
028Games, toys; ice or roller skates; scooters toysSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
039Transport; vehicle rental; taxi transportSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 23, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Nov 8, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 3, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 3, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 11, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 26, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 26, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 4, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 11, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 25, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Mar 25, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 25, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 25, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 24, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance