USPTO serial 79144183
FILM&FILM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWERS, ALEXANDER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FILM&FILM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Cole
Thomas W. Cole Roberts Mlotkowski Safran & Cole P.C.7918 Jones Branch Drive, Suite 500McLean, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines and apparatus for wrapping, packing and packaging; machines and apparatus for use in the process of silage stretch wrapping; mechanically powered apparatus for wrapping, packing and packaging; mechanically powered apparatus for use in the process of silage stretch wrapping, packing and packaging; electrically operating tools for use in agriculture; electrically operating tools for use in the process of silage stretch wrapping, packing and packaging; silage fodder sealing machines; parts and fittings for the aforesaid | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 016 | Plastic wrapping and packaging materials; plastic stretch film and/or sheet for wrapping and packaging; films in plastic material for wrapping and packaging; plastic stretch film for wrapping and packaging silage bales; synthetic stretch adhesive plastic film for wrapping silage bales; plastic protective packaging for silage; silage bale stretch wrap; printed matter, namely, brochures, product descriptions and documentation for systems for silage wrapping and silage storage | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 017 | Plastics in the form of films and sheets; plastics in extruded form for use in agriculture and horticulture; plastic mulches for use in agriculture and horticulture; non-textile sheet plastic materials included in class 17 for wrapping bales of fodder; pre-stretched stretch film for use in agriculture and horticulture; synthetic resins; plastic films, plastic sheets and plastic sheeting for use in the manufacture of stretch film, stretch wrap, pre-stretched stretch film, and pre-stretched stretch wrap for use in agriculture and horticulture | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2019 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 27, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 11, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 27, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 30, 2014 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Oct 10, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 29, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 18, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 31, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |