USPTO serial 79144426
VENTLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FIORELLI, JOANNA ELISA-HOLGUI
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VENTLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
22949 Ammersbek, DE
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric motors and drives for machines in the nature of drive units and drive motors for clack valves in ventilation and smoke extraction systems for buildings or in equipment installed in buildings; electric motors and drives for machines in the nature of drive units and drive motors for facade elements, windows, doors and light domes; drives for machines in the nature of chain drives for clack valves, facade elements, windows, doors and light domes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, namely, electrical conductors, electric switches, electric transformers, electric accumulators, voltage regulators for electric power, electric controllers; electronic controllers and components therefor, namely, transmitters of electric signals; electric and electronic regulating units, namely, control units for regulating start-up electrical motors, voltage regulators for electric power; electric cables for supplying energy and data communication; data bus systems comprising USB hardware, USB operating software, host bus adapters; data processing equipment, namely, couplers; computers; computer software for use in building ventilation, namely, controlling windows, analysing of weather data, controlling climate zones and regulating radiator vales | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| May 5, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 28, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 2, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 27, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 21, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |