USPTO serial 79144517
IMAGINATIVE LIGHTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 401
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GILLES, DEBORAH LYNN MEINERS
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IMAGINATIVE LIGHTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DANIEL J. PIOTROWSKI, EDWARD W. GOODMAN, KATHLEEN A. ASHER, EDWARD BLOCKER, MICHAEL E. MARION
DANIEL J. PIOTROWSKI, EDWARD W. GOODMAN, KATHLEEN PHILIPS IP&SP.O. BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Lighting control apparatus and software programs for remotely controlling lighting systems, such as e-book, app driven or alternative appliances or toys supporting integrated lighting systems; electronic ballasts for lighting purposes; light emitting diodes (LEDs), organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs), laser diodes and zener diodes; downloadable software applications in the field of lighting, optical control apparatus, thermic control apparatus, electronic circuits for remotely controlling lighting systems within a domestic environment in which content or field of usage is correlating or activated by linked toys or the playground environment, light control systems and light management systems | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | Electric lamps, light fitting in the nature of functional and decorative wall and ceiling luminaires, table and desk lamps, floor lights and LED lighting fixtures for indoor and outdoor lighting applications linked to sleeping and playtime routines, namely, nightlights, portable utility lights, wake up lamps, electronic torches for lighting and lighting installations; Solid State lighting and electronic lighting components, in particular, LED modules wholly or partially consisting of integrated LEDs, OLEDs and polymer emitting diodes; light fittings in the nature of ceiling light fittings and lighting installations with LED light sources, electronic pocket torches for lighting and lamp shades, parts for the aforesaid goods | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2015 | ERFT | TEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 23, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 30, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 5, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 28, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |