USPTO serial 79144584
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cynthia A. Moyer
Cynthia A. Moyer Fredrikson & Byron, P.A.200 South Sixth StreetSuite 4000Minneapolis, MN 55402| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | [ Alcoholic beverages, namely, alcoholic ciders, digesters, liqueurs, spirits; ] AOC wines, namely, wines with protected appellation of origin | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2024 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 4, 2021 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 30, 2015 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Sep 23, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 3, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 17, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |