Drawing for PUREANALYTICS

USPTO serial 79144654

PUREANALYTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4690359Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Feb 24, 2015
Examiner
RITTNER, HANNO I
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUREANALYTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Valerie Calloway

Valerie Calloway International Business Machines Corp.1 North Castle DriveIntellectual Property- TrademarksArmonk, NY 10504

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware, namely, computers, servers and storage apparatus; computer operating programs for control of operations and execution for computer systems, software and computer networks; computer programs for connecting networks and computer systems, servers and apparatus for storage of different kinds; operating system software; computer programs for connecting computers to each other and for allowing computer activities across a global computer network; computer operating programs for managing systems, software and processes in an information technology environment, instruction manuals sold as a unit with the above-mentioned goodsSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
016Printed materials, namely, books, brochures, news sheets, instructional manuals, written presentations, instructional and teaching materials, all in the field of computers, computer services, information technology and electronic business transactions via a global computer networkSECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042Computer system integration services; computer consultation services; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting computers, servers and computer programs in the nature of diagnosing problems; computer system design services for others; computer system analysis; interconnection of computers and computer programs, namely, integration of computer systems and computer networks; testing of computer programs and computer hardware, namely, software, computer and server testing; installation, updating and maintenance of computer programs; computer programming services for othersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 12, 2024DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 12, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
May 12, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 4, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Aug 8, 2022XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Aug 8, 2022XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
May 10, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Sep 10, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Feb 24, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Sep 17, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 17, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Mar 4, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 23, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 15, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 11, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 11, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
May 24, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 24, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Dec 19, 2014GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Dec 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 3, 2014OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 3, 2014OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 19, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Nov 3, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 17, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 13, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Oct 13, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 1, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 14, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 14, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 12, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 12, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 8, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 8, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 4, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
Apr 3, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance