USPTO serial 79144683
ZERO WEB ZEROWEB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZERO WEB ZEROWEB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Provision of application services for mobile phone/smart phone/tablet pc; hosting/management/development/maintenance of application; hosting of advertising/marketing software; management of advertising/marketing software; development of advertising/marketing software; maintenance of advertising/marketing software; provision of application services for mobile terminal; development of advertising/marketing software for mobile terminal; maintenance of advertising/marketing software for mobile terminal; hosting of advertising/marketing software for mobile terminal; design and development of website via the internet; development of application on demand for mobile terminal via the internet; development of groupware client for smart phone; development of graphical user interface for smart phone | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 1, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 14, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |