USPTO serial 79144898
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Soya proteins, soya protein concentrates, isolated soya protein, soya-based meat substitutes, tofu, spiced tofu variations, soya spreads, soya drinks, soya dessert, fermented soya dairy-like products such as soya-yoghurts and soya yoghurt drinks, soya whey drinks, soya-based substitutes for diary products in liquid, paste, and powder form, as far as they are included in this class | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Coffee, cocoa and chocolate drinks, beverages on grain basis such as oat drink and rice drink | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 25, 2020 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2020 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 9, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 4, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2014 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |