Drawing for ARAYMOND RG

USPTO serial 79144920

ARAYMOND RG

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4801583Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 1, 2015
Examiner
CLYBURN, CARLA DIONNE
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with ARAYMOND RG?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet G. Ricciuti

Janet G. Ricciuti JANET GILBERT RICCIUTI, PC2003 KALORAMA ROAD NWWASHINGTON, DC 20009United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating, or controlling electric currentACTIVE
010[ Surgical apparatus and instruments for medical [, dental, and veterinary ] use ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
022[ Ropes, strings, ] [ tarpaulins, ] [ cables not of metal ]SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED
035[ Advertising; business management; business administration; dissemination of advertising material in the nature of leaflets, prospectuses, printed matter, samples; document reproduction; organization of exhibitions for commercial or advertising purposes; online advertising on a computer network; publication of publicity texts; dissemination of advertisements; public relations ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
041[ Training services, namely, technical training on products in the field of technology and innovation ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED
042[ Engineering services, namely, engineer evaluations and assessments in the fields of science and technology, namely, clipping, connecting, and bonding; Scientific and technical services, namely, research and development in the field of clipping, bonding, and connecting; technical research services, namely, technical project study for marketed products; industrial design services, namely, styling graphic creation, development, and design of industrial parts in the fields of clips, fasteners, bonds, and connectors ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 9, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Dec 9, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Dec 9, 202571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED
Dec 1, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Jul 31, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Sep 1, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Jul 2, 2024NURCNOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED
May 29, 2024LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED
May 29, 2024COC.CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED
May 28, 2024APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Apr 4, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Mar 10, 2024LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 27, 2023INNPPARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jan 19, 2023INPSPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jan 19, 2023INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Dec 1, 2022INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Apr 1, 2022NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED
Apr 1, 2022C75PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.
Apr 1, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Aug 25, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 22, 2016ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 1, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 12, 2016XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB
Feb 12, 2016XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED
Dec 1, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 1, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
May 27, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 27, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 27, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 11, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 8, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 8, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 8, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 8, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 5, 2015ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Apr 28, 2015PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Apr 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 10, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 27, 2015MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED
Mar 23, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Mar 20, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 20, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Mar 20, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Mar 20, 2015RGRRREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED
Mar 17, 2015APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF
Mar 5, 2015ERRSTEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT
Jan 6, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 6, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 29, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 29, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 29, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 18, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 14, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 10, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance