USPTO serial 79144955
BLOHM KÖRBER SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEASER, ANDREW C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLOHM KÖRBER SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lebow
1727 King StreetSuite 105Alexandria, VA 22314Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting, shaping and finishing metals or other materials; internal and external circular grinders, centerless grinders, non-circular grinders and camshafts, crankshaft grinders, surface grinders and angle grinders, grinding machines; pencil grinders, honing machines; one-dimensional and multi-dimensional laser treatment machines, namely, laser engraving machines, laser welding machines; eroding machines; laser machines, namely, laser machines for cutting, marking and engraving; tool grinders; universal circular grinders; angular infeed grinders; high-speed grinders; internal and external thread grinders; groove grinders; polygonal grinders; cylinder grinders; production grinders; grinders and laser treatment machines, namely, laser engraving machines, pneumatic controls for grinders and laser treatment machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | Instruments for non-medical testing purposes, namely, probes for testing semiconductors, gas testing instruments; measuring apparatus, namely, electric measuring devices, precision measuring apparatus, current meters, electromechanical level gauges, automatic detectors; electrical, magnetic and optical testing apparatus, namely, electric measuring devices, precision measuring apparatus, current meters, electromechanical level gauges, automatic detectors; computer programs for operating grinders and laser treatment machines, computer software for used for electric measuring devices; measuring machines, namely, electric measuring devices, precision measuring apparatus, current meters, electromechanical level gauges, automatic detectors | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; internal and external circular grinders, centerless grinders, non-circular grinders and camshafts, crankshaft grinders, surface grinders and angle grinders, grinding machines; pencil grinders, honing machines; one-dimensional and multi-dimensional laser treatment machines, namely, laser engraving machines, laser welding machines; eroding machines; laser machines, namely, laser machines for cutting, marking and engraving; tool grinders; universal circular grinders; angular infeed grinders; high-speed grinders; internal and external thread grinders; groove grinders; polygonal grinders; cylinder grinders; production grinders; grinders and laser treatment machines, namely, laser engraving machines, pneumatic controls for grinders and laser treatment machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 041 | Organization and conducting of workshops and training workshops in the field of commissioning, operating, servicing, maintaining and programming of machine tools, namely, powered machines for cutting or shaping or finishing metals or other materials; internal and external circular grinders, centerless grinders, non-circular grinders and camshafts, crankshaft grinders, surface grinders and angle grinders, grinding machines; pencil grinders, honing machines; one-dimensional and multi-dimensional laser treatment machines, namely, laser engraving machines, laser welding machines; eroding machines; laser machines, namely, laser machines for cutting, marking and engraving; tool grinders; universal circular grinders; angular infeed grinders; high-speed grinders; internal and external thread grinders; groove grinders; polygonal grinders; cylinder grinders; production grinders; grinders and laser treatment machines, namely, laser engraving machines, pneumatic controls for grinders and laser treatment machines | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Industrial research and analysis services in the field of industrial design; design and development of computer software; computer programming services; consultancy in connection with information technology | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by United Grinding Group AG
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLOHM KÖRBER SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 23, 2018 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 5, 2018 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2018 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2017 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 27, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 28, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 28, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 25, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | DCPN | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 3, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 19, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |