Drawing for R.EVOLUTION

USPTO serial 79145086

R.EVOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WANG, WEN HSING
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with R.EVOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Abrasive pastes, papers and powdersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
007Abrasive tools being parts of machines; disc shaped rotating grinding tools, parts for machines; abrasive grinders, bits, disks, wheels, stones, for use with machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—
008Abrasive grinders, wheels, disks and stones for use with hand toolsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 13, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Sep 13, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Dec 4, 2015FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 13, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 2, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 16, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 16, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Nov 13, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 13, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 17, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 17, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 17, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 16, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Apr 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 10, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance