Drawing for LUXE CORE

USPTO serial 79145132

LUXE CORE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4883417Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jan 12, 2016
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LUXE CORE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thilo C. Agthe

Thilo C. Agthe Wuersch & Gering LLP100 Wall Street, 10th FloorNew York, NY 10005UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising; business administrationSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 2020DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 17, 2020DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 8, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 12, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 12, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Apr 12, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 12, 2016R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Oct 27, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 27, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 24, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 7, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 7, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 7, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Oct 2, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Sep 22, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 22, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Sep 22, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Sep 22, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 16, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Feb 23, 2015GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Feb 23, 2015GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 23, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 20, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 27, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 27, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 13, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED
Jan 12, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 12, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jan 12, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Dec 19, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 14, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 14, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 8, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 18, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Apr 18, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Apr 18, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Apr 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 10, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance