USPTO serial 79145165
COEXTANT MAKING CONTENT FLOW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4779421Status 404
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 28, 2015
- Examiner
- MARTIN, CHRISTINE C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COEXTANT MAKING CONTENT FLOW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Lyhus
John E. Lyhus Fitch, Even, Tabin & Flannery LLP120 S. LaSalle StreetSuite 1600Chicago, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, in particular management and content automation systems for intra and extranet, web appearances, portals and e-business applications | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer consulting and implementation services, namely, information technology (IT) consultancy as well as development and programming of software for customers as standard solutions for enterprise content transformation and content flow automation | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Coextant Systems International AG Deutshland
- Other trademarks owned by Theum AG
- Other trademarks owned by Coextant Systems International AG Deutshland
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named COEXTANT MAKING CONTENT FLOW
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2022 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2022 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 27, 2022 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Oct 11, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2016 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 15, 2015 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 12, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 8, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 22, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 20, 2014 | LIMS | LIMITATION OF GOODS/SERVICES FROM IB ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 16, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |