Drawing for INSULCOAT

USPTO serial 79145545

INSULCOAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
ASKEW, MEGAN RUTH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INSULCOAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary Lynn Boardman

Mary Lynn Boardman Pyrotek Incorporated705 West 1st AvenueSpokane, WA 99201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
017Insulation material for roofing; insulation material for use in the ship building industry; materials for wall insulation systems, namely, for thermal modification and acoustical improvement; insulating paintsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 10, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Sep 10, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 16, 2024DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 30, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 15, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 15, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2017FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 8, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 6, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Oct 9, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 9, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 23, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Sep 23, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 6, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 6, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 8, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 7, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Dec 2, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Nov 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 10, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 10, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED
Jul 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 25, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 30, 2014RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 12, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 12, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 10, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 22, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Apr 18, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Apr 17, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance