USPTO serial 79145599
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kiranjit K Dharsan
Kiranjit K Dharsan Seiter Legal Studio2450 Colorado Ave., Suite 100ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Access control systems; keypad readers and keypad access units for use with access control systems; readers for reading cards, fobs and tokens containing an RFID module and inductor coil, all for use in gaining access to buildings and secure areas; RFID proximity cards, fobs and tokens all for use in gaining access to buildings and secure areas; biometric readers; proximity readers incorporating hands-free access control connectivity, for use with electrical door operators and electrical door locks; proximity readers with long range capabilities, for use with electrical door operators and electrical door locks; controllers to electrically operate aforementioned readers; controllers for electrically operated locks and motors to open and secure doors and barriers; power supplies for use with access control apparatus; encoded and RFID cards, fobs and tokens, RFID module all for use in gaining access to buildings and secure areas; security control, monitoring and warning apparatus, namely, electric and electronic video and audio surveillance equipment for monitoring and controlling access to and within buildings; vehicle license plate recognition system comprising video cameras and electrical controllers; encoded hands-free electronic key fobs and keycards utilizing dual-frequency operation; controllers and electronic interfaces to operate readers used in hands-free access control systems; external door-entry panels incorporating audio, video and access control utilities; internal audio and video user panels for use with door entry panels; liquid crystal displays for use in access control and building security equipment; none of the foregoing related to electronic apparatus and instruments, namely, magnetic identity cards, integrated circuits, semiconductor chips, data processors, computer memories, false coin detectors, coin-actuated mechanisms for coin-operated machines and electronic signal transmitters, electronic safe locks that control access by means of a numerical code-entry keypad or biometric fingerprint-identification technology reader or a combination of both | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 13, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 20, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 20, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 21, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 21, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 31, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 1, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |