Drawing for LION KING

USPTO serial 79145923

LION KING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LION KING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Inner tubes for pneumatic tires; tires; tires for vehicle wheels; tires for bicycles, cycles; tires, solid, for vehicle wheels; automobile tires; tubeless tires for bicycles, cycles; inner tubes for bicycles, cycles; pneumatic tires; adhesive rubber patches for repairing inner tubesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
May 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 8, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Oct 17, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 30, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Sep 30, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 8, 2015MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 8, 2015ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Apr 8, 2015OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 8, 2015OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 30, 2015RFNPREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 3, 2015OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 23, 2014OPNSOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2014OPNCOPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED—
Sep 29, 2014ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 31, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 31, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jul 25, 2014PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jul 16, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 15, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 26, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 26, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 26, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 26, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 26, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 23, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 5, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 4, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 2, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 1, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance