USPTO serial 79146105
3D-MATRIX SOLUTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4929528Status 706Renewal
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 5, 2016
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- Historical data usage
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with 3D-MATRIX SOLUTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $797*
Plus Government fees of $2,550
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Pamela N. Hirschman
Pamela N. Hirschman Davis Graham & Stubbs LLP3400 Walnut Street, Suite 700Denver, CO 80205United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines in the field of intralogistics, namely, machines used for transporting and transferring goods in a warehouse; machines used for conveying and facilitating goods for logistics facilities; machines in the field of intralogistics, namely, storage and retrieval devices; machines in the field of intralogistics, namely, automated storage and retrieval systems consisting of combinations of computer-controlled cranes, conveyors, carousels, hoists, automated storage trays, automated rotating shelving systems, sorting machines, mechanical and hydraulic lifts, for automatically placing and retrieving loads from defined storage locations; machines for logistics installations, namely, order-picking systems comprising automated machines and lines for the selection, processing, packaging, and shipping of customer orders, packing machines; transporting machines, namely, conveyors, skid rests, slides, namely, powered ramps, loading and unloading machines, and raising machines for placing and retrieving goods from storage locations; conveyor belts; belt, roller and chain conveyors; elevators; lifting and hoisting devices, namely, lifting devices, namely, power operated lifts used to transport and place portable storage containers and goods, hoists, overhead travelling cranes; stacker cranes; roller bridges; machines for the commissioning of goods, namely, sorter systems comprising conveyors, commissioning and storage installations and drives consisting of the aforesaid goods and parts of the aforesaid goods; machines for the packaging of goods; robot machines, namely, industrial robots and handling robots; automatic material handling systems consisting of palletizers, case elevators, automatic pallet dispensing machines and automatic slip sheet dispensing machines, industrial trucks, on-rail transfer carts, conveyors and cantilevered crane loading platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | [ Computer hardware and computer software in the field of intralogistics, namely, for logistics management and for control and monitoring of logistical areas within a warehouse system; computer software in the field of intralogistics, namely, software for the management of supply chain operations; computer software in the field of intralogistics, namely, software for management of warehouse systems ] | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
| 012 | Vehicles in the field of intralogistics, namely, shuttles, aerial conveyors and automated guided vehicles; storage and retrieval vehicles, namely, trolleys, sleds for transport purposes, fork lift trucks; rack feeder vehicles; shelf-bound conveying apparatus, namely, trolleys, transport sledges featuring a lifting function for independent operating within a rack storage unit and for storing and retrieving stored goods | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Racks, namely, storage racks; rack systems consisting of cabinets, tables and shelves in the field of intralogistics; packing and sorting tables; all of the aforesaid goods, including for use in combination with rack systems, conveyor belts, roller conveyors; packing and sorting stations comprising tables, shelves, and storage racks; shelves and rack systems consisting of storage racks and shelves, and components for the aforesaid goods of metal sold as a unit therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SSI Schäfer Noell GmbH; Lager- und Systemtechnik
- Other trademarks owned by SSI Schäfer Noell GmbH; Lager- und Systemtechnik
- Other trademarks owned by SSI Schäfer Automation GmbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Similar marks named 3D-MATRIX SOLUTION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2026 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2026 | 71AG | REGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 30, 2026 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2025 | REM4 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 17, 2024 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2024 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | INNP | PARTIAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| May 30, 2023 | INPS | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 30, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| May 2, 2023 | INPR | PARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | NA71 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | 71.P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 4, 2022 | ES71 | TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2021 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2017 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Jul 5, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 5, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 22, 2016 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 30, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 24, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 18, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 30, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |