USPTO serial 79146155
A BIELLA ITALY ARTE CASHMERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with A BIELLA ITALY ARTE CASHMERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Justin R. Young
Justin R. Young Dineff Trademark Law Limited160 North Wacker DriveChicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Leather and imitations of leather; animal skins; animal hides; trunks and travelling bags; umbrellas and parasols; walking sticks; whips, harness and saddlery; covers for animals; umbrella rings; saddle trees; key bags; fastenings for saddles; leather shoulder belts; harness; alpenstocks; walking sticks; umbrella sticks; vanity cases, not fitted; luggage; travel baggage; all purpose carrying bags; sling bags for carrying infants; gym bags; chain mesh purses; tool bags of leather sold empty; hand bags; bridles; bridoons; gut for making sausages; straps for soldiers' equipment, namely, backpacks; hunting bags; briefcases; satchels; leatherboard; leather or leatherboard boxes; leather straps; collars for animals; horse collars; furs coats, jackets and cloaks; horse blankets; leather laces; leather thongs; straps of leather for saddlery; harness traces; horseshoes; leather thread; moleskin imitation of leather, not for medical purposes; umbrella covers; whips; knee-pads for horses; leather cases; saddle cloths for horses; saddle cloths for horses; trimmings of leather for furniture; harness fittings; leather leashes; imitation leather; walking stick handles; umbrella handles; suitcase handles; sling bags for carrying infants; sling bags for carrying infants; cat o' nine tails; bits for animals harness; muzzles; cattle skins; skins of chamois, other than for cleaning purposes; rubber parts for stirrups; business card and credit card cases; music cases; wallets; muzzles; mesh bags for shopping; leather for furniture; haversacks; feed bags for animals; bags of leather for packaging; beach bags; bags for climbers in the nature of all-purpose carrying bags; reusable shopping bags; wheeled shopping bags; boxes of vulcanized fiber; hat boxes of leather; butts parts of hides; walking stick seats; riding saddles; stirrups; stirrup leathers; umbrella and parasol frames; handbag frames; harness traces; garment bags for travel; rucksacks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 024 | Traveling blankets, traveling rugs; blankets for outdoor use; woolen fabric; wool base mixed fabrics; cashmere blankets, cashmere fabrics | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Sashes for wear; cashmere scarves; shawls and stoles | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 27, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 28, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 7, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 3, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 16, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |