USPTO serial 79146225
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kiranjit K Dharsan
Kiranjit K Dharsan Seiter Legal Studio2450 Colorado Ave., Suite 100ESanta Monica, CA 90404UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Access control systems; electronic keypad readers and keypad access units for use with access control systems; electronic card readers for reading magnetically encoded swipe cards; electronic readers for reading cards, fobs and tokens containing an RFID module and inductor coil; electronic readers for use with magnetically encoded swipe cards, RFID proximity cards, fobs and tokens; electronic programmers, namely, electronic devices for encoding and programming magnetically encoded swipe cards, RFID proximity cards, fobs and tokens; electronic biometric readers, namely, fingerprint and iris-recognition scanners; electronic proximity readers for electrical door operators and locks incorporating hands-free access control connectivity; electronic proximity readers for electrical door operators and locks; electronic controllers to electrically operate aforementioned readers; electronic controllers to electrically operate, link and report events from aforementioned readers to computers and local area networks; electronic controllers for electrically operated locks and motors to open and secure doors and barriers; power supplies for use with access control apparatus; magnetically encoded cards, encoded key cards, radio frequency identification (RFID) credentials, namely, cards and tags, and readers for radio frequency identification credentials, magnetically encoded key fobs and tokens used to gain access to buildings and controlled areas; computer software used to control access to and within buildings; local area network hardware and software for managing and communicating data relating to building security and access control; modems; controlled access security apparatus, namely, electronic locks operated through the use of keycards, through the use of keypads or a combination of keycards and keypads; data security apparatus, namely, local area network hardware which controls access by means of locks operated by keycards and keypads and by processing data received from keycards and keypads; security control, monitoring and warning apparatus, namely, electric and electronic video and audio surveillance equipment for monitoring and controlling access to and within buildings, namely, cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, recorders, electronic components of security systems, and computer software for use with cameras, switchers, monitors, microphones, recorders, electronic components of security systems; vehicle license plate recognition system comprising video cameras and electrical controllers; computer hardware, software and firmware for networking and interfacing all aforementioned readers and writers and host computers used in the fields of security and access control; encoded hands-free electronic key fobs and keycards utilizing dual-frequency operation; electronic controllers and electronic interfaces to operate readers used in hands-free access control systems; local area network hardware and software for use in access control systems; computer network and wireless network adapters, bridges, hubs, routers and switches; electric data cable and electrical connectors to facilitate the installation of all aforementioned equipment; external electronic door-entry panels for buildings and controlled areas incorporating audio, video and access control utilities; internal audio and video user panels for use with door entry panels for buildings and controlled areas; liquid crystal displays for use in access control and building security equipment; exit and entry switches used with access control systems; demonstration and display equipment for use with all the aforementioned goods, namely, flat panel display screens | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 11, 2015 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2014 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2014 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2014 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 25, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2014 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 30, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 12, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 12, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 10, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |