USPTO serial 79146396
OLYSLAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OLYSLAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer programming; software development; technical project management in the field of ICT; technical consultancy and information regarding the aforesaid services; the aforesaid services whether or not with the use of databases and/or on behalf of the automobile industry; aforesaid services also via the Internet | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2014 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 9, 2014 | CREV | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - ATTORNEY REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 2, 2014 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 30, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 15, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 13, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |