Drawing for BIERJET

USPTO serial 79146624

BIERJET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4753718Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 16, 2015
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BIERJET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Neil F. Greenblum

Neil F. Greenblum Greenblum & Bernstein, P.L.C.1950 Roland Clarke PlaceReston, VA 20191UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Dispensing systems for beer comprising beer pumps, tank, hoses, and several cocks; filling machines; beer pumps; vending machinesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
020Sideboards being furniture; furniture; furniture, namely, sales and display counters; furniture, namely, sport bars and hospitality unit; pub furnitureSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
032BeersSECTION 71 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 27, 2024DENCNOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 27, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
May 27, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Oct 24, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB—
Sep 26, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB—
Sep 26, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED—
Aug 31, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Dec 31, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71—
Jun 16, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED—
Sep 16, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 16, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
May 21, 2015ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Apr 4, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Mar 31, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 20, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 30, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 30, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Nov 20, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 28, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2014NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 27, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 27, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
May 24, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 23, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 15, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance