Drawing for PGT SUNDRIED ASH

USPTO serial 79146630

PGT SUNDRIED ASH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PGT SUNDRIED ASH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric T. Fingerhut

Eric T. Fingerhut Dykema Gossett PLLC1300 I Street, N.W.Suite 300 WWashington, DC 20005

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020FurnitureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
035Wholesale store services, retail store services and import and export agencies all in the field of furnitureSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Jul 19, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Feb 20, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 29, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 29, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 8, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Oct 21, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 21, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 29, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 3, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 12, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jun 12, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 10, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 6, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
May 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 22, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 22, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 15, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance