USPTO serial 79146710
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey M. Furr
Jeffrey M. Furr Furr Law Firm2622 Debolt RoadUtica, OH 43080UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, wireless broadcasting, videoconferencing services, transmission of digital files, television broadcasting, telephone communication services, teleconferencing services, telecommunications routing and junction services, rental of telephones, rental of telecommunication equipment, providing user access to global computer networks, providing telecommunications connections to a global computer network, providing online forums for providing online forums for entrepreneurs and companies, providing internet chatrooms, providing access to databases, news agencies, namely, the transmission of news items to news reporting organizations, message sending, information about telecommunication, electronic mail, electronic bulletin board services, computer aided transmission of messages and images, communications by telephone, communications by fiber-optic networks, communications by computer terminals, cellular telephone communication | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 12, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 8, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 16, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 17, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 19, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |