USPTO serial 79146728
DOGTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOGTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2024 | RNWL | INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 8, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 8, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2015 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 21, 2015 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 15, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2015 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 6, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 20, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 20, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |