Drawing for NEGRONI COCKTAIL

USPTO serial 79146787

NEGRONI COCKTAIL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEGRONI COCKTAIL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sean F. Mellino

Sean F. Mellino D. Peter Hochberg Co., L.P.A.1940 East 6th St.6th FloorCleveland, OH 44114

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 10, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 10, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Dec 17, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 4, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 18, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 25, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 8, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 7, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 21, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Oct 21, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 17, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 17, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 19, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 19, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Dec 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 21, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 5, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jun 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 5, 2014UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED
Jun 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
May 21, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
May 21, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
May 20, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 20, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 16, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 15, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance