USPTO serial 79147121
FARMO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LUDEMAN, JESSICA ANN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FARMO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Tapioca and sago; flour and preparations made from cereals; bread, pastry and confectionery; yeast, baking powder; gluten additives for culinary purposes; oat-based food; flour-based food; starch for food; crushed oats; husked oats; high-protein cereal bars; cereal bars; biscuits, cookies; malt biscuits; small biscuits; buns; custards baked desserts; waffles; chocolate; confectionery; almond-based confectionery; couscous; cakes; natural sweeteners; soya flour; tapioca flour for food; porridge of flour with milk; hominy; flours for food; ferments for pastes; oat flakes; dried cereal flakes; fine flour for food; flat breads or cakes; ices; fruit coulis (sauces); wheat germ for human consumption; glucose for culinary use; gluten prepared as foodstuff; milled corn; roasted corn; popcorn; bread dough; thickening agents for cooking foodstuffs; yeast; yeast powder; yeast natural; macaroni; malt for human consumption; maltose; marzipan; chocolate mousses; mousse dessert cakes; muesli; crushed barley; husked barley; gingerbread; bread; rusks; unleavened bread; breadcrumbs; bread rolls; almond paste; cake dough; pasta; macaroons pastry; noodle-based prepared meals; pastry; pastilles confectionery; petits fours cakes; pizzas; cake powder; powders for edible ices; cereal preparations; flour-milling products; ravioli; rice; sandwiches; linseed for human consumption; oat meal; semolina; hominy grits; cereal-based snacks; rice-based snacks; spaghetti; noodles; tapioca; cakes; rice cakes; tortillas; vermicelli | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 1, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 28, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 1, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 31, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |