CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BMAX

USPTO serial 79147249

BMAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4729603Status 707Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
May 5, 2015
Examiner
JACKSON, ELIZABETH FLEMING
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BMAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael F. Swartz

Michael F. Swartz Egbert, McDaniel & Swartz, PLLC1001 Texas Ave., Suite 1250Houston, TX 77002United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Electromagnetic machines for stamping, molding, forming, crimping [ , cutting, deep drawing and the punching ]of a metal shape with a magnetic field; [ riveting machines; metallic parts sealing machines for industrial purposes; ] electromagnetic apparatus for forming, crimping and welding of objects and materials, namely, electromagnetic machines for forming, crimping, and welding metal; electro-hydraulic machines for shaping of objects and materials, namely, shaping of metallic parts; welding coils, crimping and forming coils as parts of machines; high-voltage generators to supply such machinesACTIVE—
040[ Treatment of materials, namely, magnetization of metal; metal treating in the nature of molding, stamping, crimping, forming, cutting, deep drawing and punching of metal; magnetic pulse welding ]SECTION 71 - CANCELLED—
042[ Engineering services; research in the field of mechanics; ] technical research in the field of stamping, molding, forming, crimping [ , cutting, deep drawing and punching ] of metals; engineering project studies, namely, conducting feasibility studies in the field of engineering; all of the foregoing services in connection with machines for stamping, molding, forming, crimping [ , cutting, deep drawing and punching of metal shapes with a magnetic field, with electromagnetic apparatus for shaping, crimping and welding of objects and materials, with electro-hydraulic machines for shaping of objects and materials, and with welding, crimping and shaping coils as parts of machines ]ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 2, 2026INPRPARTIAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED—
Nov 14, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2025NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED—
Aug 2, 202571.PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC 71 ACCEPTED—
Jul 28, 2025APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Apr 24, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED—
May 5, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED—
Mar 8, 2024NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2024ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Sep 28, 2021NA75NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2021C75AREGISTERED - SEC. 71 ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Sep 28, 2021APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
May 4, 2021ES75TEAS SECTION 71 & 15 RECEIVED—
May 5, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
May 15, 2018LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED—
Apr 26, 2018LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 30, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 5, 2015XXSSGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB—
Aug 5, 2015XXCRGENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED—
Aug 5, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 5, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 17, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 17, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 14, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 28, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 28, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 10, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 9, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 9, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 31, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 27, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 11, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jun 11, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 11, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 10, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 3, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
May 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 29, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance