Drawing for TACANZA

USPTO serial 79147299

TACANZA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4647257Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 2, 2014
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TACANZA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christopher Leming

Christopher Leming Syngenta Crop Protection AGSchwarzwaldallee 215Basel, CH-4058SWITZERLAND

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, herbicidesSECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 1, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 1, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 24, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Jun 17, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Jun 17, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Feb 18, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Jun 18, 2021C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Mar 11, 2021CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Feb 28, 2021CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 5, 2020ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 2, 2019REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Mar 20, 2018ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 20, 2018REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
May 16, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 27, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 27, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Mar 2, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2014R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 16, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 27, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 16, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 9, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 6, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Aug 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 5, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 30, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 30, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jul 29, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 29, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance