Drawing for BE CHOC'D

USPTO serial 79147332

BE CHOC'D

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BE CHOC'D?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, artificial coffee; flour and preparations made from cereals, bread, pastry and confectionery; honey, treacle; yeast, baking powder; salt, mustard; vinegar, sauces; spices; sweets and chocolate productsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 3, 2023NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jun 25, 2020NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Oct 4, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 24, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Apr 13, 2017CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 22, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 4, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 4, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 2, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 2, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 20, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 6, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jun 3, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 3, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 3, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 2, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 2, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 30, 2014LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED
May 29, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance