Drawing for PT

USPTO serial 79147442

PT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
RUTLAND, BARBARA A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Pipes and tubes of metal; tubes of copper alloys; pipes of metal including those from alloy steel and titanium; tubes of nickel alloys; tubes of stainless steel; drain pipes made of metal; metal tubes for industrial use; metal pipes for liquid and gas transfer; ducts and pipes of metal for central heating installations; ducts of metal for air-conditioning installations; elbows of metal for pipesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 20, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Sep 24, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jan 4, 2019CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 31, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 11, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jan 9, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Nov 20, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 4, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 4, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 20, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 9, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 9, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 27, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 12, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jun 12, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jun 12, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 3, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
May 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 29, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance