USPTO serial 79147635
ROGUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIDDLETON, BERNICE L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROGUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arkadia DeLay Olson
Arkadia DeLay Olson Husch Blackwell LLP190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer software for use in smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-computer chips; video graphics accelerator; video graphics controller; computer graphics software; cloud computing software for use in advanced graphics processing and visual computing; computer software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; integrated circuits; computer graphics hardware; graphics cards; semiconductors, computer chipsets for use in smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-computer chips and micro-processors; graphics processing units (GPUs); software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing for electronic games for use in smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-processors; downloadable computer graphics tools; 3D and 2D video acceleration devices for use on television, digital set top boxes, mobile applications (including radios and phones), personal computers, computer tablets and micro computer chips; parts therefor; downloadable electronic publications in the field of use in smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-computer chips | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Web site design services; design and development of computer hardware and software for advanced graphics processing and video computing applications; cloud computing services; software as a service featuring software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; providing temporary use of non-downloadable computer software for use in smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-computer chips including computer software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing used in electronic game software; computer graphics services; provision of technical information, advice and assistance in relation to software, graphics and games developers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing intellectual property rights; licensing of technology in the field of smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-computer chips, source code, and computer software; licensing of computer software and hardware; licensing of intellectual property and industrial property rights | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Dec 21, 2018 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2018 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 5, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2017 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2017 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 16, 2017 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2017 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 24, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 27, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 11, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 10, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 16, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 11, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 5, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |