USPTO serial 79148398
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Hertfordshire, WD4 8LZ, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arkadia DeLay Olson
Arkadia DeLay Olson Husch Blackwell LLP190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Video processors; video enhancers for display devices, television receivers and film and video devices; electrical video monitor controllers; video digitisers and apparatus for display devices, television receivers and film and video devices; video graphics accelerator; video graphics controller, computer graphics software; cloud computing software for use in advanced graphics processing and visual computing; computer software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; integrated circuits; computer graphics hardware; graphics cards; semiconductors, computer chipsets for use in transmitting data to and from a central processing unit and micro-processors; graphics processing units (GPUs) for the purpose of rendering images; downloadable computer graphics tools for the purpose of rendering images: 3D, 2D, video acceleration devices, namely, sensors for use on television, digital set top boxes, mobile applications, handheld computer games, personal computers, computer tablets and micro computer chips; parts and fitting of the aforesaid goods; downloadable electronic publications in relation to the aforementioned goods; all of the aforementioned shall relate to image signal processors (ISPs) only, none of the aforesaid in respect to toy model helicopters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 028 | Handheld computer games equipment, none of the aforesaid in respect of toy model helicopters | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Web site design services; design and development of computer hardware and software for graphics and video applications and video processing; cloud computing services featuring software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; software as a service featuring software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; providing temporary use of non- downloadable computer software for use in smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-computer chips; computer graphics service; provision of technical information, advice and assistance in relation to design and use of software, graphics for games developers | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 045 | Licensing intellectual property rights; licensing of technology, source code, computer software; licensing of computer software and hardware; licensing of intellectual property and industrial property | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2017 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 18, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 19, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2015 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| May 22, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2015 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jan 3, 2015 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 30, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |