Drawing for RAPTOR

USPTO serial 79148398

RAPTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MICKLEBURGH, LINDA BOHANNON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RAPTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Arkadia DeLay Olson

Arkadia DeLay Olson Husch Blackwell LLP190 Carondelet Plaza, Suite 600St. Louis, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Video processors; video enhancers for display devices, television receivers and film and video devices; electrical video monitor controllers; video digitisers and apparatus for display devices, television receivers and film and video devices; video graphics accelerator; video graphics controller, computer graphics software; cloud computing software for use in advanced graphics processing and visual computing; computer software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; integrated circuits; computer graphics hardware; graphics cards; semiconductors, computer chipsets for use in transmitting data to and from a central processing unit and micro-processors; graphics processing units (GPUs) for the purpose of rendering images; downloadable computer graphics tools for the purpose of rendering images: 3D, 2D, video acceleration devices, namely, sensors for use on television, digital set top boxes, mobile applications, handheld computer games, personal computers, computer tablets and micro computer chips; parts and fitting of the aforesaid goods; downloadable electronic publications in relation to the aforementioned goods; all of the aforementioned shall relate to image signal processors (ISPs) only, none of the aforesaid in respect to toy model helicoptersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
028Handheld computer games equipment, none of the aforesaid in respect of toy model helicoptersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
042Web site design services; design and development of computer hardware and software for graphics and video applications and video processing; cloud computing services featuring software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; software as a service featuring software for advanced graphics processing and visual computing; providing temporary use of non- downloadable computer software for use in smartphones, mobile computing devices, personal computers and micro-computer chips; computer graphics service; provision of technical information, advice and assistance in relation to design and use of software, graphics for games developersSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
045Licensing intellectual property rights; licensing of technology, source code, computer software; licensing of computer software and hardware; licensing of intellectual property and industrial propertySECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 17, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Aug 17, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jun 2, 2017NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Sep 9, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 19, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Dec 18, 2015OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 2, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 2, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 19, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 19, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 12, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 1, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW
Jun 1, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
May 22, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 10, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 10, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Jan 21, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 20, 2015CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW
Jan 3, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Dec 30, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 29, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 29, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 22, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Jul 4, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 1, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Jul 1, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Jul 1, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Jun 30, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jun 26, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance