USPTO serial 79148616
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonora Hoicka
Leonora Hoicka International Business Machines CorpNorth Castle DriveIntellectual Property - TrademarksArmonk, NY 10504| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer servers; software for use in controlling the operation and execution of computer programs and networks; software for use in connecting disparate computer systems, servers and storage devices; software for managing hardware, software and processes that exist within an information technology environment, namely, operating and application systems software, and instruction manuals sold as a unit therewith | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of data and documents via computer terminals; webcasting services provided via computer networks; provision of multiple-user access to a global computer information network; provision of multiple-user telecommunications access to interactive databases through web sites on a global computer network | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely design, updating of software; technological consulting services relating to the technology field of computer hardware and software; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer apparatus and computer systems; computer services, namely. Cloud hosting provider services; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computers, servers and software problems; computer system design services for others; computer system analysis; interconnection of computer hardware and software, namely, integration of computer systems and networks and software; computer software and hardware testing services, namely, testing of computer software, computers and servers to assure compliance with industry standards; installation, updating and maintenance of software; computer programming for others | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 25, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2016 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2015 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 9, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 6, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 23, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 10, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 23, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 10, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |