USPTO serial 79149125
ECOCOTTON BACK TO NATURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GUSTASON, ANNE C
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECOCOTTON BACK TO NATURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen M. Nipper
Stephen M. Nipper BUCHANAN NIPPER LLC1508 W. Cayuse Creek Dr., Ste. 125Meridian, ID 83646UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Non-woven fabrics; woven fabrics; household linen; bed linen; bath linen; cloth pennants; handkerchiefs; duvet covers; towels; and fabric flags | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 025 | Clothing, not being protective clothing, incorporating reflective or fluorescent elements or material; socks; footwear; headgear, namely, hat and caps; clothing, namely, baby blankets, babies' pants, baby bibs not of paper, baby bodysuits, baby bottoms, and baby tops; and robes | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 2022 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2022 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2020 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 12, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2017 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 27, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 16, 2015 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2015 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 11, 2014 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |