USPTO serial 79149343
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | Animal foodstuffs; lime for animal forage; dog biscuits; bird food; cattle food; stall food for animals; protein enriched animal foodstuffs; pet food; edible chews for animals; beverages for pets | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2024 | DENC | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 27, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | INTS | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | INPC | INVALIDATION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| May 1, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2021 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2018 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2016 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 21, 2016 | FIMP | FINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 22, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 7, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 27, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 22, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 6, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |