Drawing for Serial No. 79149391

USPTO serial 79149391

Serial No. 79149391

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 79149391?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cosmetics; alum stones (astringents); astringents for cosmetic use; body deodorants; antiperspirants for personal use; cosmetic creams; after-shave creams; depilatory wax; balms other than for medical use; hair lotions; dentifrices; essential oils; soaps; perfumerySECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Apr 8, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
May 16, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 28, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Dec 23, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 15, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 15, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 22, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 18, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 2, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jul 29, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance