Drawing for NINJA WARRIOR

USPTO serial 79149697

NINJA WARRIOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DERBY, KAREN SHEREE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NINJA WARRIOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William J. Sapone

William J. Sapone Ware Fressola Maguire & Barber LLP755 Main Street, Bldg. 5P.O. Box 224Monroe, CT 06468

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028slot machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 15, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Jul 13, 2018FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 13, 2018FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2018FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jun 13, 2017MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 13, 2017ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 21, 2017DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 23, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Nov 23, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 9, 2016UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED
Sep 4, 2016GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 4, 2016GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2016CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 11, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION
Feb 11, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 5, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Aug 3, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 25, 2015CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 25, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jun 19, 2015CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Jun 19, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Mar 30, 2015LIMNLIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Mar 27, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Jan 29, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Jan 29, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jan 7, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 6, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 6, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 19, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 11, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 8, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 24, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance