Drawing for DR. GERNY

USPTO serial 79149782

DR. GERNY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PARKS, KIMBERLY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DR. GERNY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
016Printed matter (printing products); instructional or teaching material, plastic materials for packaging (not included in other classes)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED
044Medical services; hygienic and beauty care; beauty institute servicesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 27, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 26, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 27, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 20, 2021NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
May 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 20, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Dec 30, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Dec 30, 2015OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 20, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 20, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 22, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 22, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 18, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 17, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 16, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 5, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Jul 30, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 24, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance