Drawing for STARK INDUSTRIES

USPTO serial 79149792

STARK INDUSTRIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
LAM, HAI-LY HUYNH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STARK INDUSTRIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

C. ANDREW IM

C. ANDREW IM IM IP LAW PLLC29 CHASE ROAD #355SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Agricultural machinesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Nov 8, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Apr 1, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Mar 16, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Mar 16, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Mar 17, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 16, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 1, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 22, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 7, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 7, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 6, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 1, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 1, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 31, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance