USPTO serial 79149852
THEOBROMA LOUNGES PAVILIONS BARS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THEOBROMA LOUNGES PAVILIONS BARS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey C. Joyce
JEFFREY C JOYCE BOHAN MATHERS LLCPO BOX 449PORTLAND, ME 04112-0449UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Cafe services, bar services, provision of food and drinks | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2017 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Nov 17, 2015 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 16, 2015 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 3, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2015 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2015 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 10, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |