USPTO serial 79149870
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Margaret O'Donnell
Mary Margaret O'Donnell Blue Filament Law PLLC700 E. Maple RoadSuite 450Birmingham, MI 48009| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Services for providing food and drink, particularly bakery services, pastry services, restaurant services, cafeteria services, catering services; bar services, particularly coffee shop services and tea room services | SECTION 71 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2024 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2023 | INNT | TOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | INTR | TOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | C71T | CANCELLED SECTION 71 | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | REM3 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2016 | FINV | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | XXSS | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2016 | XXCR | GENERIC MADRID TRANSACTION CREATED | — |
| Dec 29, 2015 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2015 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 8, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 7, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 9, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |