Drawing for TOPMARK LASER

USPTO serial 79150012

TOPMARK LASER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4766393Status 706Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 7, 2015
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
Historical data usage

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with TOPMARK LASER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mainak H. Mehta

Mainak H. Mehta Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP525 B Street, Suite 2200San Diego, CA 92101United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Identification tags of metalACTIVE
007Industrial machines, mechanical apparatus and devices for material processing using lasers, namely, laser labeling machines, laser marking machines, laser cutting machines, laser etching machines, laser engraving machines and laser machines for forming ferrous and nonferrous metals, plastics, and semiconductor materials including silicon and ceramics; automatic industrial machines for labeling, marking and engraving, cutting and removal of materials from electronic components; parts for the aforesaid goods included in this class; industrial fiber laser machines and laser systems, namely, stationary laser machines for cutting, drilling, marking, engraving, cladding, bending, forming, hardening and coating ferrous and nonferrous metals, plastics, semiconductor materials including silicon and ceramicsACTIVE
009Lasers, not for medical purposes; lasers, not for medical purposes, namely, lasers for printing technology, lasers for imaging and fiber lasers; optical fiber amplifiers, optical fibers, fiber optic components, in particular optical fiber couplers; laser diodes; software for laser systems, namely, software for the configuration and control of laser machines; computer printers, electronic plotters; digital plottersACTIVE
016Print materials, especially marking materials, namely, printable paper, printed paper labels and signs, shipping, adhesive and address labels and marking pensACTIVE
020Identification signs of plasticACTIVE
040Material treatment of ferrous and nonferrous metals, plastics, and semiconductor materials, namely, tagging in the nature of etching, marking being color laser marking, engraving, stamping, cutting, welding, nibbling and laser processing in the nature of laser engraving, laser scribing and treatment of material by laser beam of said materialsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 18, 2026PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Aug 17, 2026EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2026PR71POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC.71
Feb 9, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Oct 8, 2025ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2024REM4COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (10-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 26, 2024RNWLINTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION RENEWED
Jul 21, 2022NA71NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 71 - E-MAILED
Jul 21, 202271AGREGISTERED-SEC.71 ACCEPTED
Apr 27, 2022APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL
Sep 17, 2021ES71TEAS SECTION 71 RECEIVED
Jul 7, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Apr 29, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Nov 27, 2015FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Nov 9, 2015FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Nov 9, 2015FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Oct 7, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jul 7, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 1, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Apr 1, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 17, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 17, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Feb 26, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Feb 26, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Feb 26, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Feb 26, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 29, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Dec 29, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Nov 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 11, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 11, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 11, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 10, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 9, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 2, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 1, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 31, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance