Drawing for CROFER 22 APU

USPTO serial 79150079

CROFER 22 APU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CROFER 22 APU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Sheets, strips, rods, wires, pipes with cross-sections of all kinds, all goods made from alloys mainly containing iron and chromiumSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
009Components being parts of fuel cells, made from alloys mainly containing iron and chromiumSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2017DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED
Aug 25, 2017DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 2, 2017LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Oct 12, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 11, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 10, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 22, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 6, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 6, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Sep 24, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Aug 14, 2015NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Apr 10, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 10, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 10, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 12, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 12, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 12, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 11, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 8, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 4, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Jul 31, 2014SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance