USPTO serial 79150114
MIONIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 402
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ARANT, LUCY
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIONIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | keyboards, headset, computer mice, mouse pads, joysticks, hand controller for videogames | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 7, 2024 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2016 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2016 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2016 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 28, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 11, 2015 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 1, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 18, 2014 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 17, 2014 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2014 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 12, 2014 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |