Drawing for I ACE IT

USPTO serial 79150252

I ACE IT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with I ACE IT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; cleaning, polishing, degreasing and abrasive preparations; soaps; perfumery, essential oils, cosmetics, hair lotions; dentifricesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
014Precious metals and their alloys and goods made of these materials or coated therewith not included in other classes; jewelry, precious stones; timepieces and chronometric instrumentsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED
025Clothing, footwear, headgearSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
May 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 15, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 14, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 13, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 6, 2015CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Apr 14, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 14, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 3, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 16, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 16, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 14, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 13, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 7, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance