Drawing for HELIX

USPTO serial 79150268

HELIX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BROOKSHIRE, DAVID AARON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HELIX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Machines for use in surface treatment of metals, polymers and semiconductors; galvanizing machines; apparatus for the cleaning of galvanizing compositions containing ion exchanger compositionsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Mar 27, 2023CORNCORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED
Jan 2, 2023CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB
Feb 12, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
May 5, 2016FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Apr 7, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Apr 7, 2016FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Jan 31, 2016OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB
Jan 13, 2016OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
Jan 13, 2016OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Apr 8, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 7, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2015ATRVATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 30, 2015LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW
Mar 27, 2015LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB
Sep 25, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Sep 5, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Sep 5, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Sep 5, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Sep 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 7, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance