Drawing for TECNIS SYMFONY

USPTO serial 79150355

TECNIS SYMFONY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4792439Status 404
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 18, 2015
Examiner
DINALLO, KEVIN M
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECNIS SYMFONY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Marci A. Blazer

Marci A. Blazer Johnson & JohnsonOne Johnson & Johnson PlazaNew Brunswick, NJ 08933UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Intraocular lenses; intraocular lens implantation devices and parts and fittings therefor; accessories for intraocular lenses and intraocular lens implantation devices, namely, ophthalmic surgical instrument, namely, handheld device used during cataract surgery and vitrectomySECTION 71 - CANCELLED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED
Oct 26, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION
Aug 11, 2023ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Dec 27, 2022INNTTOTAL INVALIDATION PROCESSED BY THE IB
Nov 30, 2022INTSTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION SENT TO IB
Nov 30, 2022INPCINVALIDATION PROCESSED
Nov 19, 2022NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Nov 4, 2022INTRTOTAL INVALIDATION OF REG EXT PROTECTION CREATED
Mar 4, 2022C71TCANCELLED SECTION 71
Aug 18, 2020REM3COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 71 (6-YR) E-MAILED
Nov 11, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 11, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 11, 2018NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Jul 19, 2018ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB
Nov 24, 2016NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED
Feb 20, 2016FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB
Feb 2, 2016FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB
Feb 2, 2016FIMPFINAL DISPOSITION PROCESSED
Nov 18, 2015FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
Aug 18, 2015R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 2, 2015GPNXNOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB
Jun 2, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 13, 2015OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB
May 13, 2015OP2RNOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB
May 13, 2015NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Apr 27, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Apr 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 2, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Apr 2, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 1, 2015ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Mar 26, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED
Mar 25, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 25, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Mar 25, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Mar 12, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 12, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 20, 2014CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB
Aug 29, 2014RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB
Aug 16, 2014MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED
Aug 14, 2014RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB
Aug 14, 2014RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU
Aug 13, 2014RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW
Aug 12, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 12, 2014NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Aug 7, 2014REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance